• Cuba today

    Reports, analysis, and stories from the struggle of the Cuban people to defend and build their socialist revolution.

  • The Quebec Student Strike

    The story of the biggest student mobilization in Canadian history as it unfolds.

  • The Class Struggle in Greece

    Reporting the viewpoint of the Communist Youth and the Communist Party of Greece for a People's Greece.

  • The youth movement

    Statements and analysis about the way forward for the youth and student movement in Canada today by the YCL-LJC.

  • Socialist theory

    Reflections on how to build a better world from a Leninist point of view.

campus conservative agenda: audio link MP3

Saturday, April 11, 2009 0 comments

The website wikileaks hosts the audio tapes (1) (2) of recent strategy and tactic meetings of campus conservatives.
The leak was made on March 13, 2009.

In addition, copies of agendas, photos, speakers lists and other documentation are available. Also of note is the turn of events at the CBC. Wikileaks' source mentions and speculates the following:

After running a few times on CBC Radio One's early morning news cycle on March 20, 2009, the story was abruptly pulled. Thus, this tape has been released to Wikileaks, given the concern that this story was pulled or censored from within the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.
The CBC story mentions the use of front groups or clubs. Such clubs mentioned are: Star Trek Club, Star Wars Appreciation, Games and Leisure, and the Friedrich Nietzsche club at Carleton University in Ottawa. Such names hardly sound political, Tory, or aimed at attacking the Canadian Federation of Students. What's the big secret?

National Post engages in cheap red-baiting against RY

Friday, April 10, 2009 0 comments

Please note that contrary to what the National Post has written, the RY blog post (which you can read here) on the Student School was simply an email circulated widely on the left. Slopppy journalism and cheap red-baiting NP! Your attempts to smear an honest solidarity campaign, by saying that criticism of the racist Zionist state of Israel is anti-semetic, doesn't cut ice. We will be issuing a full statment soon.

The struggle to "Save Women's Studies" continues...

Wednesday, April 08, 2009 0 comments


by Andrew Garvie
Reprinted from The Cannon


Student outrage at Senate's Women's Studies cut by Andrew Garvie

Apr 8, 2009 - Last night, April 7, the UofG's Senate voted to put the final nail in the coffin of the Women's Studies program, despite massive student opposition from the visitor's gallery. The vote from the Senate floor was approximately 60/40 against a motion that would have saved the program for another year and allowed for time to reevaluate the BUGS decision for its elimination. The motion was shot down right at the tail end of a marathon four hour senate meeting where a similar motion to save the Organic Agriculture program had been passed just an hour before. Immediately after the votes were counted the meeting erupted with shouts from the students, faculty and community members in the gallery.

The move to eliminate the Women's Studies program has met with unprecedented student opposition and accompanied by calls from across the country addressing the University of Guelph's administration to retract their support for the removal of the program. There has also been solidarity rallies held in Peterborough and as far away as Winnipeg ( video ). Students and faculty spoke passionately in support of the program but the majority of the Senate's membership were not swayed.

Many students were felt that a clear reason for the elimination of Women's Studies has not been made. Originally the UofG's administration cited financial concerns and pointed to the 16 million dollar deficit that they are running heading into an economic crisis. President Summerlee began last nights meeting with a preamble citing the unfortunate economic circumstances the University was in and the need to make hard decisions. However this was not the central reason given last night for the cut. When it was widely reported that the proposed cut would only end up saving .17% of the overall deficit, many students felt that the University changed its approach. Now the administration and the Dean in charge of Women's Studies is pointing to a stagnation of the program's curriculum, low-enrollment and a lack of clarity of its future after consultation with its faculty. Faculty in the visitor's gallery last night made it clear that they did not feel that there was meaningful consultation. There were meetings where the future of the program were discussed and where several possibilities of changes to the curriculum were made but it was not understood by the attendees of those meetings that a lack of concrete decisions would result in the elimination of the program.

Many voices from the gallery expressed a view that the UofG was being dishonest in portraying itself as a progressive institution where environmental concerns and issues of social justice are central to its mandate. They saw the cuts as a move away from programs committed to sustainable agriculture and programs committed to providing an academic forum for discussions surrounding racism, sexism and homophobia. The general attitude was that low-enrollment was not a sufficient determinate of a program's worth and that even if it was, both programs have a chance to grow in the future. Organic Agriculture was saved using arguments that the program would serve an up-and-coming industry dedicated to solving the planet's most urgent environmental problems. Apparently the argument that Women's Studies enrollment would grow due to the fact that more and more high schools are offering Women's Studies classes for the first time did not go over as well with Senate members.

The administration was not the only target of the student's disgust last night. Many felt particularly betrayed by their representatives who ended up voting against the motions to save Women's Studies. Both the incoming and outgoing CSA Academic Commissioners, Nathan Lachowsky and Christi Garneau-Scott, decided to vote against the CSA's Board of Directors decision to oppose the elimination of Women's Studies. This was in spite of the fact that CSA bylaws state that Executives are bound to take direction from the Board and that the Board had specifically directed the Academic Commissioner to vote in favor of continuing Women's Studies. Also, previous Board meetings had already censured Garneau-Scott for not following through on a decision where she was to lead the Executive in writing a condemnation of the proposed cuts. It seems that although students used their speaking rights as observers of last night's meeting, not all of their representatives on the floor could be counted on to present their opinions and vote accordingly.

Organizers of the campaign to "Save Women's Studies" have vowed to explore other avenues to continue the fight and "the Cut the Cuts" campaign will undoubtedly continue to remain relevant as the economic crisis shows little evidence of letting up and more cuts are planned.

For more info on these issues check out a recent article in Western's student press here

Stay tuned for pictures of last night's rally and Senate meeting.


For more info contact: cutthecutsguelph@gmail.com

The true hidden agenda

1 comments




Photo from recient Conservative Conference at the University of Waterloo
7 Apr 2009 | David Safruk | The Manitoban

Steven Fletcher’s recent talk on campus

On Thursday, March 19, the University of Manitoba Campus Conservatives held an open event that was advertised to the public as a talk at the University of Manitoba with the Honourable Steven Fletcher, minister of state (democratic reform). The event was attended by both minister Fletcher and sitting MP for Winnipeg South, Rod Bruinooge. I attended this event in the hopes of hearing about Fletcher’s new mandate on the government of Canada’s opinion on state, and more importantly on democratic reform. Was I ever mistaken.

Although towards the end of the forum, Fletcher did answer a select few pre-determined questions actually regarding Canadian democratic reform, the event did not focus on democratic reform as the posters advertised, but rather focused almost entirely on student union politics. Steven Fletcher sat as UMSU president at the end of the 1990s for two consecutive terms, so clearly, he’s no stranger to the politics on university campuses. But as a representative of the constituents of Charleswood-St. James-Assiniboia and as sitting minister for the government of Canada, especially the minister of democratic reform, he has no business in the affairs of independent and democratic students’ unions and federations.

Minister Fletcher, on several occasions, went into rants where he referred to UMSU and the Canadian Federation of Students, my representatives, as a bunch of left-wing crazies, the “loony left,” and “loony tunes.” The minister further went into rants about the free press and independent students’ newspapers referring to the Manitoban as a socialist rag. He then began encouraging young Conservative members to take over students’ unions to promote the Conservative ideology. At several points in his talk, incoming UMSU president-elect Sid Rashid, who was also in the audience, challenged Fletcher on his clearly biased statements regarding current UMSU policies and procedures.

What is the government doing meddling in the affairs of independent and democratic student unions? This is not only offensive but completely inappropriate.

The Ryerson Free Press recently reported on March 16, 2009 in an article titled “Conservative Party strategy to take over student unions exposed” that “audio recordings, photographs and documents were leaked from recent Conservative Party student workshops in [Waterloo] training young Conservatives how to take over student unions [ . . . ] ” The audio files are available on WikiLeaks under “OPCCA workshop on how-to takeover student governments.” At a workshop at the University of Waterloo, voices identified as sitting MP Peter Baird and his campaign manager Aaron Lee-Wudrick gave advice on how to siphon money from students’ unions through “front organizations” that would work to further the goals of the Conservative Party.

The recent event held at the University of Manitoba further adds to the damning evidence that the Conservative Party, the current governing party of Canada, is engaged in a national campaign to advance their partisan agenda and undermine the role of democratic student organizations.

Students should be alarmed and outraged at the blatant Conservative government moves to undermine democracy on university campuses. As taxpayers and citizens of Canada, students should be even more alarmed that government resources are being used to send Conservative MPs to engage in these partisan workshops held entirely to interfere in the democratic affairs of students’ unions.

Steven Fletcher, as the minister of democratic reform, needs to immediately resign from his position as his own personal partisan agenda is clearly getting in the way of his ability to represent Canadians.

The Conservative Party has no business meddling in my democratic students’ union and needs to focus on the real issues affecting Canadians. If Conservative MPs are more interested in the affairs of student unions than the bigger issues of the country, they should resign from their positions and immediately call a new election so that real MPs can be elected to focus on the real issues of the day.

David Safruk is a third-year political studies honours student and the current minister of finance for the University of Manitoba’s Undergraduate Political Studies Students’ Association.

OCCUPATION! - students overrun legislature

Monday, April 06, 2009 0 comments

Lift the CAP!
right: pool of the Black Star
[photo: wikimedia]

expanded from the print edition of Rebel Youth Magazine #7
by David Tymoshchuk

WINNIPEG, November 5th 2008- So we're playing duck, duck, goose. Most of us playing are university students. Except one, a pre-school girl, who is delighted that we are playing with her on the marble floor. The shout of “GOOSE!!SSE!...SE!” echoed throughout the Manitoba Legislative Building along with quick footsteps and squeaking running shoes. It certainly is the most opulent gymnasium I've ever been in, and it is fitting, given why we are there. The toddler, the daughter of a student, is the youngest of the student activists fighting for access to post secondary education for Aboriginal peoples.

One hour earlier...

We are very serious about the state of education in Manitoba. Earlier that day, we held one the largest student rallies in years. About 1000 students, including high school students rallied in front of the building the activists were to later occupy. The Communist Party and the YCL were there. Unions came and brought along their banners in support of the students. A huge Canadian Federation of Students (CFS) banner in orange and a photo of premier Gary Doer's face demanded “STOP NDP LIES!”*.

The students were very upset at the government, and were pumped at the action they were doing. They finally had a voice and they were giving it a short test run this afternoon. 20 litre pails for drums boomed along with chants. I am sure many used their full lung capacities as many became hoarse when I talked to them later. Corporate press reports that attacked the student movement later had to admit that the rally invoked images of “army cadets ”, due to the discipline shown by the students, and “took on the atmosphere of a 1960s student protest ” for its passion.

The minister responsible for post secondary education Diane McGifford, was out of the country. Lucky her. So the education minister, NDP MLA for Gimli, Peter Bjornson, came to speak at the rally. After it was clear in his speech that he was only saying they knew best and was only an apologist, shouts of "LIAR!!!" rang out. It became a booming chant and this, along with other jeers and cat calls interrupted the minister from...uh, doing nothing... just delivering his speech of how superior market driven education was (omitting mention of who would benefit).

A sit in at an undisclosed “government office ” was announced at the end of the rally and those interested were to go to a parking lot and “wait for a bus ” to board. No bus would come. We were already there. Shouts of “Go!Go!Go!” signaled us to storm the legislature through the side entrance, a revolving door. I was one of the first through, but not sure were to go. I remember that we should go to the grand interior staircase and sit between the bronze bison statues. “Where the hell is that?” I thought as I ran through the Pool of the Black Star (a round room below the rotunda) to the corridor on the other side. Some guy forgot himself and a loud “whoo hoo!” echoed inside, followed by a harsh “SHHH!” from several of us.

Our action was well planned, we were as disciplined as we could be given the balance of working in an on a need to know basis we had to have to pull this off. It wasn't perfect, a few things expectedly didn't go according to plan (I lost my sense of direction for one) but we pulled the sit-in off. Later, I heard shouts, and they were not from us. I guess our guy's loud “whoo hoo!” alerted the guards. Or maybe a door alarm or TV monitor did. I can only guess. Now what? Think fast. It was best to stick together in the area we were, rather than attempting to go to the main staircase and risk getting isolated into ineffective pockets of activists throughout the building.

A hefty security guard was running full bore as chaos ensued. I ducked back into the Pool of the Black Star and the guard ran past and actually skidded to a halt before another entrance. They seemed to be freaking out and starting to lock all doors. Sounds of shouts, orders, echoes and the sight of student activists pouring in filled my senses before the doors locked. We were all in the same area (Pool of the Black Star) and sat down. I could see other activists with placards on the other side of the door. “They're calling the police ” I heard someone say. We were not to go anywhere, we could not leave, nor go to the washroom. Papers with legal and other instructions were passed around. “Have you read this?” we all asked each other as we finished reading what we could expect in jail and what lawyer to contact if some police brutality occurred.

We had extra CFS leaflets. I received one and held it up in my hand. I turned my face upward; “Want a leaflet?” I asked the guard behind my back. He took it in his black leather gloved hand. I was surprised he did, considering his menacing facial expressions. The situation was de-escalated as it was wisely seen as a bad political move if we were hauled off. We continued the sit in and watched the faces outside the revolving door.

Later, I found out that the reporter for the Winnipeg Free Press was shoved out of the door, along with students and their leaders. The president of UMSU, Jonny Sopotiuk, and the Chair of CFS Manitoba, David Jacks were not allowed to go in to talk to those carrying out the action, nor be able to negotiate with the authorities. We were “detained ” in a lock down, a spin to make us look bad. We occupied the building. A sit-in action protesting conditions in education was the truth of the matter.

Corporate media say thirty of us were “detained ” inside. (“Thirty?...Don't reporters fact check anymore?” I thought the day after the sit-in as I read the newspaper at the library.) I did a head count. Thirty nine of us inside. “Must be a few more hiding somewhere ” I think, I round up to forty. Protesters shouted outside the doors demanding the doors unlocked and for our safety.

Later, a deal was reached as we were not about to just give in. Reporters were finally allowed in to videotape and interview some students inside. After the media left to file their reports, we started to play duck, duck, goose to keep the toddler busy given the circumstances. Actually I must confess that I enjoyed the game myself, I have not played duck, duck, goose in twenty years!

While we were doing our bit, students in Winnipeg and Brandon, MB were helping by sending faxes to government offices. They sent so many that the lines were jammed for hours. Of course, this was a international day of action so I heard reports over the following days of events in the rest of the country and in Europe.

Like I said above, a deal was reached. We were allowed to finally use the washrooms, and “given ” passes. We were to meet the minister whom we had booed and jeered at earlier. We were shown to the cafeteria in the basement level. We waited for several minutes, An aid of Diane McGifford's was there already. Bjornson appeared. We had his attention and were civil versus earlier at the rally. But we had our issues. It seems the NDP had theirs.

It is not worth reporting too long on this meeting as it only consisted of two sides that restated positions: the NDP's and student activists. The students in action were largely working class. The minister promised that: “the rate of tuition increase would not be allowed to reach double digits.” That seems to have stuck with me the most.

Among other things were that programs were available to help with access. I am not much of a gambler to hope for a chance to win under one of these programs. The minister told us there were channels to direct complaints, among them a hard to find commission web site were statements seem to vanish into the memory hole. I was told by an activist earlier that the mandate of this “Levin Commission ”** was even changed without notice or record, thank goodness for web archive caches!

We were not going to get anywhere at this meeting, so we made sure to be productive and made sure the government clearly knew our demands for Aboriginal access for post-secondary education. We were given the run around, told that it was a federal responsibility. We countered that Manitoba could lead by example. We gave examples of Ireland, Sweden, and Cuba as having free tuition why not Manitoba?

We stated that Metis were not under the federal Indian Act so Manitoba was able to do something, it was not just a “Federal issue ”. We stated that Cuba is only a small island while Manitoba is a huge resource rich province. Hydro-electric profits and royalties from resources (most Aboriginal) are huge and can be used to provide for Aboriginals. We received some excuse that “lake levels fluctuate.”
Wow, a government minister just told us that we have no money (Hydro profits) to spend on education because lake levels fluctuate.

“I have to pick up my kids...I'll answer two more questions ” said the minister finally. We kept him in this meeting for hours. Like I said, we going to be productive and drag that meeting out, make our issues known and see how many excuses the NDP minister could come up with. Lake levels...I was waiting for him to say it was the moon that caused those fluctuations. That and werewolves.



The purpose of the student occupation at the Manitoba Legislative building was to fight for increased aboriginal access to post secondary education.

Why?

  • Education including post-secondary education is written into the treaties with First Nations.
  • In 1996, the Federal government has imposed a cap of 2% increases on funding for basic core services, (this includes post secondary education) breaking the treaties at a time of increasing Aboriginal youth seeking an education, and increasing tuition fees, inflation etc.
  • INAC, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, provides funds for post-secondary education via the Post-Secondary Student Support Program (PSSSP). It has a 2% cap on fund increases. The Inuit also fall under the PSSSP.
  • Over 50% of the Aboriginal population of Canada is under the age of 23.
  • Every thing is increasing faster than 2% will allow for example: fees, supply costs, cost of living, population growth. There are long waiting lists for First Nations youth to attend college and university.
  • Stephen Harper wants to stop giving grants and force First Nations students to use loans. It is easier for him to bash everyone down than to help everyone up.
What has the government done ?

Because the cap means limited funding to every service on reserve, and with a rapidly growing population, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada does what is does best: study the problem. It found that on-reserve per capita expenditures for basic services have decreased by 6.4% in 10 years. Education is only a part of the problem.

What about “Non-status ” and Metis? ́

Non-status and Metis people do not get any funding***, and are subject to the same racism and situationś that hold back Status First Nation students. The fight for Aboriginal access is a beach head for the student movement. To remove the funding cap is to stop attacks on the most picked on segment of the student population, Aboriginals. This segment of the student population is what racist governments across Canada use as a thin edge of wedge that ultimately attacks all students. The government of Manitoba thinks the voting public is as racist as it is itself and hopes they will not care.

Wrong. The student movement is united.And we showed it on November 5th.

* The NDP Doer government promised a tuition fee freeze in the last election.
**The Levin report was released in early April and recommended lifting the freeze and have students pay higher tuition
***No funding, as in grants that students under PSSSP have. Funding is indirect such as scholarships, but are few and competitive to get.

 
Rebel Youth Magazine © 2013 | Designed by RumahDijual