• Cuba today

    Reports, analysis, and stories from the struggle of the Cuban people to defend and build their socialist revolution.

  • The Quebec Student Strike

    The story of the biggest student mobilization in Canadian history as it unfolds.

  • The Class Struggle in Greece

    Reporting the viewpoint of the Communist Youth and the Communist Party of Greece for a People's Greece.

  • The youth movement

    Statements and analysis about the way forward for the youth and student movement in Canada today by the YCL-LJC.

  • Socialist theory

    Reflections on how to build a better world from a Leninist point of view.

The tragedy of the First Nations University of Canada

Friday, April 16, 2010 0 comments

| APRIL 13, 2010 | REPRINTED FROM RABBLE.CA

Participants at FNUC's annual pow-wow, March 28 at the Brandt Centre, Regina. Photo: Stephen LaRose.

Given all that's happened over the past five years, it's amazing anybody can still find the time and energy to party. But as the First Nations University of Canada took over Regina's Brandt Centre on the last weekend of March for its annual pow-wow, it was almost possible to avoid thinking about the academic institution's future.

Steven Swan, a member of FNUC's student council, mans an information booth, during what's probably been the most relaxing time he's had during the last semester. That's not saying much, since the council has been an innocent casualty of one of the biggest operational crises in Canadian academic history.

Swan, a third-year education student, hopes to get a degree to teach indigenous studies to senior high school students on Saskatchewan First Nations or in inner city Regina or Saskatoon, if by some miracle FNUC is still around. Getting an education -- going to class, doing the lab work, passing the exams -- is stressful enough. Most university students coming in from rural Saskatchewan -- whether they're aboriginal or not -- find the jump from their small world to the relative bright lights of Regina or Saskatoon requires nerve.

Now, imagine you're an aboriginal student: although your home band pays a good chunk of your tuition, the pressure is on to deliver, with high marks and a job after graduation, to prove that your band council made a wise investment.

And imagine doing all that while the college undergoes a meltdown, with federal and provincial funders planning to withhold future payments, professors wondering whether their pay cheques will bounce. It's a wonder Swan, the rest of the student council, and other FNUC students haven't been driven insane by the pressure.

Created in 1976 as the Saskatchewan Indian Federated College to promote the teachings of indigenous studies by aboriginal peoples in an academic setting overseen by aboriginal peoples, it has spent the last five years lurching from crisis to crisis, and in the process giving the federal Conservative government an excuse to cut a program they weren't committed to in the first place.

For FNUC students, there are few other places in the academic world to go. As of Jan. 2005, about a quarter of FNUC's enrollment came from outside of Saskatchewan, but following the appointments of now ex-President Charles Pratt and ex-Administrative Vice-President Al Ducharme, enrollment of indigenous peoples from outside Saskatchewan dropped to nearly nil. It was a similar story with FNUC's staff.


For all those hoping that the federal government had sincerely learned about the value of aboriginal control of aboriginal education in the wake of the residential school mess, Ottawa's latest message was a cruel April Fools' joke. Indian Affairs Minister Chuck Strahl announced March 30 that the federal government would provide $3 million in transitional funding for the institution, instead of restarting its annual $7.2 million operating grant, which was suspended after allegations of misspending by FNUC's senior administration surfaced.

During a mid-January meeting with the student council, Pratt was asked about the sudden departure of chief financial officer Murray Westerlund late last November. Pratt told the student council what he had earlier told the media -- Westerlund's departure was by mutual agreement, and everything was fine, swell, tickedy-boo.

The version of events provided by Pratt to the student council didn't match Westerlund's version. A month before Pratt met the students, Westerlund filed a Statement of Claim in Regina Court of Queen's Bench, intending to sue FNUC for wrongful dismissal. People who leave a job by mutual agreement don't usually sue their previous employers. Copies of a report Westerlund presented to FNUC's board of governors that November -- just before his firing -- were also leaked to Regina media outlets.

Westerlund's statement detailed alleged controversial spending practices either committed by Pratt and Ducharme, or committed by others close to the pair. The allegations ranged from rehiring employees who had been suspected of mishandling funds, to failing to account for expenses billed to FNUC while on business trips to Hawaii, Montreal, and Las Vegas. Hundreds of thousands of dollars were allegedly involved.

The student council demanded a second meeting with Pratt; he stonewalled. They got ameeting with the chairman of FNUC's board of governors, Clarence Bellegarde, instead. And he, too, stonewalled, saying the 29-person FNUC board of governors had no right of authority to take any disciplinary action against Pratt, Ducharme, or anyone else mentioned in Westerlund's allegations until the completion of FNUC's annual audit, sometime this coming summer.

So FNUC's student council did the only thing left -- they talked to one of FNUC's major funders, the provincial government, and they took on what they saw as the Federation of Saskatchewan Indian Nations' "old boys' club," who they said led FNUC into its disastrous state. And the administration of Canada's only aboriginal-controlled post-secondary institution hurtled towards its final crash.

In the beginning was the end

The crisis allegedly started when Morley Watson, the chairman of the college's board of governors and an FSIN vice-chief responsible for the education portfolio, moved in on Feb. 17, 2005. He suspended administrative vice-president Wes Stevenson and two others, and ordered an investigation into alleged financial improprieties. The investigation included seizing computers and hacking into FNUC's email accounts for the forensic audit and the investigation, and also to monitor activities of those suspected of plotting against Watson and the new administration. Stevenson was later fired, and the university spent more than $700,000 on audits, resulting in one charge of theft over $5,000 made against Stevenson by the Regina RCMP's commercial crimes section (no trial date has been set as yet).

Almost all the FNUC's senior staff who were fired or quit after the FSIN takeover -- President Eber Hampton (Chickasaw from Oklahoma), academic vice-president Denise Henning (Cherokee from Oklahoma), Regina campus dean Dawn Tato (Seneca from New York state) and Saskatoon campus dean Winona Wheeler (Sioux from Manitoba) -- were considered amongst the most talented in North America aboriginal academia.

They were replaced, the initial appointments being Al Ducharme, an FSIN political operative, as administrative vice-president, and Pratt, a professor in the Indian business courses at FNUC, as president. This seemed to establish a trend of hiring people whose ties lay more to the FSIN than to academic work. Thus, Watson and the FNUC board of governors transformed the college into the shiniest cog in the FSIN machine.

Under orders from FNUC's board, as described in a report to the FNUC board of governors by President Eber Hampton in May 2005, just before he quit FNUC, Pratt and Ducharme refused to negotiate grievances lodged by staff represented by the University of Regina Faculty Association following the takeover. More than 30 grievances were heard by the Saskatchewan Labour Relations board. When Donald Worme, FNUC's legal counsel, advised settling the cases informally, he was fired in May 2005, and replaced with Larry Seiferling, Vice-Chief Watson's personal lawyer.

With the board of governors creating a toxic and hostile working environment, many of the best and brightest in aboriginal academia followed Hampton out the door. By the time Henning's replacement, Shauneene Pete, was fired in February 2009, she marked the 16th person with a doctorate to have either been pushed or who had jumped from the college. Pete was fired after a short, ugly jurisdiction battle with Ducharme, who wanted the responsibilities of academics brought under his office.

A year-long investigation by the Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada in 2007 found there was no overt political control of the college by the FSIN, but CAUT, representing 85,000 Canadian academic workers in post secondary institutions, thought otherwise -- they censured FNUC in 2008 and advised academics to steer clear of the place.

Student enrolment fell by nearly 40 per cent -- from 1,150 in January 2005 to about 670 as of January 2010. Many transferred to the University of Regina (FNUC is an independently-operated federated college of the U of R) or the University of Saskatchewan. FNUC's main campus, a $35 million architectural wonder designed by Douglas Cardinal, and opened by Prince Edward in 2003, is in Regina's Wascana Centre Authority, and the college has satellite campuses in Saskatoon and Prince Albert.

All universities must have a charter from a government -- in FNUC's case, the charter came in the form of the First Nations University of Canada Act, passed by the FSIN legislature. It called for one of the largest and most expensive boards-of-governors in Canada's university and college system, because the FSIN wanted to balance competing regional interests. In 2005, the university spent $355,000 to pay for the board -- per diems, travel expenses, and other incidental payments. Depending on the distance travelled, board members made from $300 to $750 per meeting, and meetings were held at least once a month.

An All Chiefs' Task Force report, issued in December 2005, called for the 32-member board to be replaced with a 13-member board, with fewer politicians and less opportunity for political control by the FSIN. The FSIN's and FNUC's response was the appointment of a 29-member "interim" board, which was top-heavy with chiefs, many of whom possessed little or no experience with operating -- or taking classes from -- a post-secondary institution. Another report in 2009, commissioned by the provincial government, also recommended a 13-member board with less political control. The Saskatchewan government, at the same time that report was presented, provided an extra $5 million in transitional funding which paid for the report and helped FNUC pay for a new contract with URFA, and to deal with its budget shortfall.

But Rob Norris, Saskatchewan's minister of education, and Strahl held sticks as well as carrots: if FNUC's administration and board of governors structure didn't change to become "more accountable," the provincial and federal governments would withhold some of FNUC's money until they did.

Last October, Indian Affairs and Northern Canada held back $1.6 million from its financial grant to the university's core operations because FNUC's administration had failed to meet two deadlines in submitting reports on its administrative overhaul. When Westerlund was fired after delivering his scathing report, Norris, like the student council, also gave up hope that FNUC was capable of reforming itself from the inside.

The governments step in

In the five years between FNUC's FSIN takeover and this past February, various provincial and federal governments had tried to prod the FSIN into overhauling its First Nations University of Canada Act, its legislation that governs the college's mandate (though it was renamed FNUC from Saskatchewan Indian Federated College in the late 1990s, the college is not a degree-granting institution, but a federated college within the University of Regina).

FNUC and the FSIN had long argued that FNUC's board required political domination by the politicians to reflect the importance of governance in aboriginal society. Detractors said the board, top-heavy with politicians, drowned out the voices of academics, administrators, and students -- for whom FNUC was created.

On Feb. 7 and 8, 2010, nearly a week after Norris announced that the province would cease its annual funding to FNUC of $5.5 million during the current fiscal year (ending March 31), the FSIN legislative assembly -- a congress of nearly 80 chiefs from Saskatchewan's First Nations -- announced it would meet at the Whitecap First Nation, south of Saskatoon. The FNUC was on the agenda, and the chiefs were preparing to do battle with the federal and provincial governments to defend the institution as it stood. As well, more than 50 students came from Regina, joining students from the Saskatoon campus, to address the assembly and lobby to overhaul the board of governors and remove Pratt as president.

A new, 12-person chief-free interim board of governors was appointed, with the only hold-over being student council president Diane Adams. She and FNUC student council communications vice-president Cadmus Delorme, spearheaded a student campaign to reform FNUC's administration and governance. The new board suspended Pratt and Ducharme (who were later fired), and hired Del Anaquod, former president of FNUC's predecessor, the Saskatchewan Indian Federated College, as its chief operating officer. The college then started rebuilding bridges with alienated individuals and organizations -- such as the University of Regina Faculty Association and the Canadian Association of University Teachers.

The province has agreed to bring back its funding -- after FNUC signed a four-year deal with the University of Regina, allowing the university to handle FNUC's money, which was where many of the battles over FNUC's control by the FSIN occurred, and which was roasted in Westerlund's report.

But Ottawa has thought otherwise. Four days after the chiefs' congress removed the board of governors, Strahl announced that INAC would suspend its $7.2 million operating payment to the college. The transitional funding announced March 30 probably pays for the severance packages of professors, who will be eagerly picked up by other universities and colleges in Canada. As for the students, they get squat.

"In reality, it means the end of First Nations University," says Jim Turk, the executive director of the Canadian Association of University Teachers. (Officials from FNUC, the student council and officials from the FSIN were unavailable for comment as the story went to press.)

Strahl's announcement does little good for FNUC's current students. Take Swan, for example. FNUC has one of the three aboriginal linguistics programs in Canada he requires to earn his degree in his area of specialization. But if and when FNUC closes its doors, Strahl's plan calls for students enrolled in his program to move to another university. Except, in Swan's case, the nearest university -- the U of Regina -- doesn't have an indigenous studies department, so where does he go to complete his education?

The dilemma students such as Swan face probably didn't enter the equation when Strahl made his decision regarding FNUC's future, just as the university's precarious future probably never entered the minds of members of FNUC's former board members or its senior administration. Students pressed the federal and provincial governments, as well as the FSIN, for reforms to FNUC's governance out of their own self-interest: they had the most to lose. Despite all they've achieved in the last three months to reform the institution, they are the ones who have lost everything.

The misspending allegations at FNUC five years ago, in retrospect, led to Watson's coup. And Westerlund's allegations as outlined in his report were more substantial, involved greater misconduct by more people, and involved more money, than anything alleged five years ago. It seems as if the actions of Watson and the FSIN -- at least until Guy Lonechild was elected Grand Chief of the FSIN in Oct. 2009 -- undermined aboriginal self government and aboriginal control over aboriginal education, essentially doing an unsupportive Conservative government's dirty work for them.

The choice of Lonechild, a former youth leader of the FSIN, is seen by outside observers as the beginning of the end of the FSIN "old boys club" that had led the organization for the better part of a generation.

By failing to act on much needed reforms on administration and governance, the FSIN and FNUC's old board brought shame and ridicule to aboriginal governance, and provided the perfect excuse for a federal government, filled with supporters who apparently base their opinion of aboriginal issues from John Wayne films, to do away with FNUC under the guise of "fiscal responsibility."

"Saskatchewan taxpayers have 34 years invested in this institution," says Randy Lundy, who heads FNUC's Academic Council. "If you close the doors on it, that investment will be gone." Whatever funds wasted by FNUC's management during their five year FSIN-inspired "reign of error" will pale beside the funds wasted -- not to mention the opportunities wasted -- on FNUC's creation if and when FNUC closes its doors for good.

Stephen LaRose is a freelance journalist in Regina who has been writing about the First Nations University of Canada for several years. His coverage of FNUC's operational crisis in 2005 for Regina-based prairie dog and Saskatoon-based Planet S magazines earned him an Award of Excellence in Post-Secondary Education Coverage from the Canadian Association of University teachers in 2006.

Cartoon: Henry Dubb votes

0 comments

click on picture to enlarge

Open letter to Stephen Harper regarding First Nations University

Tuesday, April 13, 2010 0 comments

OPEN LETTER

April 2010

The Hon. Stephen Harper
Prime Minister of Canada

Dear Prime Minister:


In June 2008 you did what no prime minister before has been willing to do – offer an apology to former students of Indian residential schools. In that apology you noted that “Two primary objectives of the residential schools system were to remove and isolate children from the influence of their homes, families, traditions and cultures, and to assimilate them into the dominant culture.”


Now, less than two years later, your government is forcing the closure of Canada’s only First Nations university -- the sole university in Canada based on First Nations traditions and cultures. By refusing to restore full funding for First Nations University, your government will now make it impossible for First Nations university students to study in an institution based on First Nations traditions and cultures.


There is a bitter irony in your government’s action, coming as it does after the Federation of Saskatchewan Indian Nations (FSIN) has addressed all of the concerns that have been expressed about the University’s governance structure and after the FSIN, the First Nations University, the University of Regina and the Government of Saskatchewan have entered into a partnership agreement to ensure proper financial and administrative management of First Nations University.


Your government’s refusal to restore full funding, which will cause the University to close after August 31, 2010, is an act of disrespect to First Nations peoples in Canada and a continuation of the very practices for which you apologized in June, 2008.


We urge you to back up your 2008 apology by restoring full Federal funding to First Nations University immediately so that it can grow and expand, not have to wind down and close.
Yours truly,
TO ADD YOUR NAME TO THIS OPEN LETTER, GO TO: http://www.caut.ca/fnuc/

CLIMATE CHANGE AND YOUTH STRUGGLE

0 comments

CLIMATE JUSTICE FOR EARTH DAY

People's Voice Editorial


Recent headlines reporting that Inuit communities are describing warming and "weirder" weather to scientists should add urgency to Earth Day events.

In expressing our support to the actions on April 22, People's Voice again calls for emergency climate change legislation. Environmental problems are not simply a question of individual consumption habits. They are deeply rooted in social‑economic realities. The Copenhagen Summit's failure to reach an agreement shows that imperialism aims to transfer the cost of climate change directly onto the backs of the world's peoples. For centuries, imperialist countries have pillaged the global south. Some, like Bolivian President Evo Morales, have recently called for climate reparations allowing third‑world countries to economically develop using sustainable technology.

Yet from international to domestic policy, Canada's Harper Conservatives have consistently allowed the big corporate polluters to set the guidelines, ignoring scientific facts while crafting destructive positions. We need to boot Harper out, and radically re‑write Canada's position to one of climate justice.

Our friends in the Young Communist League are currently debating putting climate change onto their priority areas of struggle (see below) in the lead‑up to their May 23‑25 Central Convention. We wish them well in this discussion. Climate justice is an important demand, not just of the youth but also the working class. Serious progress in this direction appears clearly incompatible with a social and economic system based on private ownership of wealth and resources. Protection of the environment requires a deep‑rooted social transformation, breaking away from capitalism, and instead putting nature before profits as a critical step towards socialism.


CLIMATE CHANGE AND YOUTH STRUGGLE


The 25th Central Convention of the Young Communist League‑Ligue de la jeunesse comuniste (YCL-LJC) will be held May 21-23 in Toronto. We reprint here some excerpts from Part 5 of the Call to the 25th Convention, the section on struggles by young people around the issue of climate change.


The issue of climate change has engaged many young people today - first, because the nature of the impacts which will primarily involve the young generation, secondly because most of us were born at a moment when climate debate became very public.

The Copenhagen conference teaches us many things. First, it illustrates how global warming is mobilizing the masses and especially the youth in all countries. The Asia‑Pacific started the flow of events around the world with some 50,000 people in the streets in Australia, Canberra, Sydney and Melbourne. In Manila, Hong Kong, Jakarta, and as in most major Canadian cities, rallies of several hundred protesters were also held. In Copenhagen itself, hundreds of thousands of people began marching in the cold to protest.

One thing is interesting to note in this mobilization: some have noticed, like the French deputy José Bové, a farmer and altermondialisme personality, that here is an opportunity to link "climate justice and social justice... Today, there is no break between the fight against global warming and the fight for another world."

With the abysmal failure of this United Nations conference which was suppose to conduct an agreement between states to reduce GHG following the Kyoto agreement, it becomes obvious to the people that the imperialist countries have no desire to act. The strings of this conference were pulled by the United States and its allies including Canada. The so‑called agreement that came out was not obtained in a democratic way and is a farce. In summary, the countries simply have the obligation by the end of the year to provide targets for 2020.

At this summit, leaders of imperialist countries have been singled out and accused of being in the pay of industry. For the general public, the belief is that industry and individual consumption are causing climate change. But as Marxists, we know that this is not so much the industry as the way it is implemented; in other words, how capitalism works. For itself, industry is not necessarily something negative. In fact, because of industry for the first time in history, the development of productive forces has the potential to produce enough to meet the needs of all.

About individual consumption, this is a way for capitalists to individualize the problem and put us all in the same boat. Under this idea, people are all equally responsible for the disaster. But the working men and women of the world do not consume as the bourgeois class does. Half the planet lives on less than $2 per day and is not liable as the capitalists who exploit them.

It is not without reason that the media propagate massively the idea of the individual solution. Only the rich can afford an electric car, organic vegetables or any other new product supposedly green. The conditions of the working class already determine its consumption. This idea of individual responsibility is dangerous and leads to even viewing with a negative eye the aspiration of some developing countries to achieve a standard of living equivalent to the occident.

Instead, we need to consider the demands of Evo Morales, President of the Republic of Bolivia and others who call for climate reparations, and funding sustainable technologies in the developing world. The obstacle to this is imperialism, which prefers to make trillions off these countries rather than address the gravity of climate change.

Climate change is not caused by all classes. Furthermore, it will not consistently impact humanity. Those who are most affected by environmental crisis will be the poorest in the world. Climate change will bring the disruption of ecosystems, and therefore lifestyles that are more dependent on the immediate environment. It will affect the health of populations, such as the development of certain infectious and respiratory diseases. Which brings us back to fight for a public health system accessible to all.

In 2007, the Secretary General of the United Nations said that in many developing countries, youth, and in particularly girls and young women, are often responsible for agricultural work, collecting water and firewood, tasks which "will become more difficult and take longer at the expense of education and productive activities as climate change affects access to water, agricultural productivity and the survival of ecosystems."

Imperialism is considering other approaches to solving global warming as well - so-called "Plan B." This is because the effects of global warming have already begun and are expected to get much worse. Therefore immediate problems of mitigation come into play. Plan B or geo‑engineering is the intentional large‑scale manipulation of the global environment, generally to reduce undesired climatic change (i.e., initiating a giant plankton bloom in the ocean, or the injection of large amounts of sulfate aerosols into the atmosphere simulating a volcanic eruption). NASA, the British Institute of Mechanical Engineers, the British Royal Society, and the UK parliament are all doing studies on geo‑engineering. But these nightmarish solutions could cause unknown damage.



Reproduction rights!

0 comments

 
Rebel Youth Magazine © 2013 | Designed by RumahDijual